<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Visual Studio &#8216;MachineToApplication&#8217; Error</title>
	<atom:link href="http://codehutch.com/2009/05/visual-studio-machinetoapplication-error/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://codehutch.com/2009/05/visual-studio-machinetoapplication-error/</link>
	<description>Online Code Repository</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 05:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://codehutch.com/2009/05/visual-studio-machinetoapplication-error/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 07:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codehutch.com/?p=63#comment-6</guid>
		<description>hehe :) 

I agree, but I don't think VS was aware that two config files existed. So, instead it just throw the closest error it knows that could possibly cause this problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hehe <img src='http://codehutch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I agree, but I don&#8217;t think VS was aware that two config files existed. So, instead it just throw the closest error it knows that could possibly cause this problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ikaruga</title>
		<link>http://codehutch.com/2009/05/visual-studio-machinetoapplication-error/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>ikaruga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 07:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codehutch.com/?p=63#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I wish VS would rather say, "Hey, you are allowed to have only one web.config!" rather than

“It is an error to use a section registered as allowDefinition=’MachineToApplication’ beyond application level This error can be caused by a virtual directory not being configured as an application in IIS.”

This error message is miles away from the actual problem. You'd really have to decipher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish VS would rather say, &#8220;Hey, you are allowed to have only one web.config!&#8221; rather than</p>
<p>“It is an error to use a section registered as allowDefinition=’MachineToApplication’ beyond application level This error can be caused by a virtual directory not being configured as an application in IIS.”</p>
<p>This error message is miles away from the actual problem. You&#8217;d really have to decipher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

